Not a fact anymore

Meteor Crater in Arizona was formed by a volcanic or underground steam explosion.

What we know now

Meteor Crater formed about 50,000 years ago when an iron-nickel asteroid struck northern Arizona at high speed.

Why it changed

Many geologists initially favored an internal explosion because impact cratering was not yet well understood. Daniel Barringer argued for impact, and Eugene Shoemaker later mapped overturned rock layers, shock effects, and ejecta that conclusively matched an explosion from above.

Status
Overturned
Category
Earth Science
Accepted for
≈75 years
Accepted approximately
Late 19th–mid-20th century
Changed approximately
1900s–1960

Meteor Crater is so sharply circular that both volcanic and impact explanations seemed plausible when geologists began studying it seriously. At the time, large terrestrial impact craters were not yet a familiar geological category.

Many geologists favored an explosion from below—volcanism, steam, or some other internal process.

Mining engineer Daniel Barringer argued in the early twentieth century that a meteorite had struck the site. He found meteoritic iron around the crater, but his case was weakened by an incorrect expectation: he believed a huge intact iron mass should remain buried beneath it and spent years trying to locate it.

Modern impact physics explains why that search failed. A high-speed collision releases enough energy to vaporize, melt, fragment, and disperse much of the projectile.

Eugene Shoemaker’s later geological mapping supplied the decisive evidence. Overturned rock layers, ejecta patterns, shocked minerals, and structural relationships matched an explosion directed downward from an impact, not upward from volcanic activity.

Meteor Crater became one of the key terrestrial laboratories for recognizing impact structures elsewhere on Earth and across the Solar System.

Evidence

Sources and what they establish

Previous belief

Primary research

Current evidence

Related entries

Or go somewhere else: