Not a fact anymore

Expressing anger aggressively drains it and reduces later aggression.

What we know now

Aggressive venting generally does not purge anger and can maintain or increase arousal, rumination, and aggressive behavior. Strategies that reduce arousal or interrupt rumination are more consistently effective.

Why it changed

Hydraulic and catharsis models treated aggressive impulses as pressure requiring release. Controlled experiments found that hitting objects, rehearsing grievances, or acting aggressively often increased subsequent aggression rather than reducing it.

Status
Overturned
Category
Psychology
Accepted for
≈75 years
Accepted approximately
Late 19th century–late 20th century
Changed approximately
1960s–2000s

The catharsis idea treats anger like pressure in a vessel. If aggressive energy builds up, expressing it—yelling, hitting something, or otherwise “getting it out”—should reduce the pressure and leave the person calmer.

Controlled experiments repeatedly failed to support that simple hydraulic model.

Participants encouraged to punch bags while thinking about someone who angered them often became more, not less, aggressive afterward. Rehearsing the grievance can maintain arousal and strengthen hostile thoughts rather than exhausting them.

More recent synthesis likewise finds better results from strategies that lower physiological arousal or interrupt rumination.

This does not mean people should suppress every emotion or never talk about anger. Constructive conversation, boundary-setting, therapy, exercise, and expressive writing are not equivalent to aggressive venting.

Feeling temporary relief also does not prove that aggression has been reduced. A behavior can feel satisfying while reinforcing the same response pattern.

The overturned claim is specifically that acting out anger works like draining a tank.

Evidence

Sources and what they establish

Primary research

Current evidence

Historical context

Related entries

Or go somewhere else: