Not a fact anymore

Natural background radiation is an important source of the spontaneous mutations that fuel evolution.

What we know now

Ionizing radiation can certainly mutate DNA, but at ordinary background levels its contribution to spontaneous mutation appears to be small. In a Lenski-style E. coli experiment beneath 1,700 m of rock, the absorbed dose rate fell from 214 to 26 nGy per hour, yet adaptation did not measurably slow over 500 generations. Replication errors and endogenous DNA chemistry provide abundant mutation sources even when ambient radiation is stripped away; ultra-low radiation can still affect cell physiology.

Why it changed

Once X-rays were shown to induce mutations, ever-present radiation from cosmic rays, rocks, building materials, and radioisotopes inside organisms looked like a plausible natural source of evolutionary variation. The idea lost weight when dosimetry and mutation biology put numbers on the competing processes: small cells are hit by background radiation far less often than mutations arise, while replication and endogenous chemistry generate mutations continually. A 500-generation underground E. coli experiment then tested the prediction directly and found no measurable slowdown in adaptation.

Status
Narrowed
Category
Evolution
Accepted for
Not quantified
Accepted approximately
1940s–1950s
Changed approximately
2010s

Hermann J. Muller showed in 1927 that X-rays could increase inherited mutations in fruit flies. Once radiation was known to mutate DNA, the weak radiation constantly arriving from cosmic rays, rocks, building materials, and radioisotopes inside organisms became a plausible natural source of evolutionary variation. In 1956, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences’ BEAR Genetics Committee concluded that background radiation supplied enough mutations for evolutionary purposes.

Radiation does cause mutations, but later work showed a problem of scale. Modelling for an E. coli experiment estimated about 6 × 10^-5 radiation-track interactions per cell per day at the surface laboratory, roughly one interaction for every 17,000 cells. The expected point-mutation rate was about 100 times higher. Replication errors, spontaneous DNA chemistry, reactive molecules, and imperfect repair generate mutations much more frequently.

Researchers then tested the evolutionary prediction directly. They grew 24 E. coli populations for 500 generations at a surface laboratory and at the Modane Underground Laboratory beneath 1,700 m of rock. The absorbed dose rate fell from 214 to 26 nGy per hour, a 6.8-fold reduction. Fitness increased in both environments, with no statistically significant evidence that the low-radiation populations adapted more slowly.

Very low radiation can still affect cell physiology. Experiments with other microbes have found changes in growth, stress responses, and gene expression when background radiation is strongly reduced. The narrowed conclusion concerns mutation supply: ordinary background radiation can damage DNA, but it appears too sparse to provide an important share of the spontaneous mutations that drive evolution.

Evidence

Sources and what they establish

Historical context

  • Hermann J. Muller — FactsNobel Prize Outreach

    Records Muller's 1927 discovery that X-ray exposure increased mutation frequency in fruit flies and the 1946 Nobel Prize awarded for the discovery of mutation production by X-ray irradiation.

Previous belief

  • The Academy in the Fifties — Beginnings of the Space AgeNational Academy of Sciences

    The Academy's historical account records Muller's 1941 view that natural radioactivity might appreciably influence mutation frequency and the 1956 BEAR Genetics Committee conclusion that background radiation provided sufficient mutations for evolutionary purposes.

Current evidence

Primary research

Related entries

Or go somewhere else: