Not a fact anymore

Bodily changes acquired through use, disuse, or environmental conditions were widely thought to be inherited and to direct evolutionary change.

What we know now

Evolution mainly works through inherited variation: genetic differences that can be passed from parents to offspring. Changes acquired during an individual's life—such as stronger muscles from exercise or the loss of a limb—are not generally written back into the inherited genetic material. Some environmental effects can persist across generations, but they are much narrower than classical Lamarckian inheritance.

Why it changed

Nineteenth-century theories often allowed bodily changes acquired through use, disuse, or the environment to be inherited. Genetics later separated changes to ordinary body cells from changes to the reproductive cells that pass DNA to offspring, while chromosome and population genetics showed how inherited variation could drive evolution without repeatedly rewriting heredity during life.

Status
Superseded
Category
Evolution
Accepted for
Not quantified
Accepted approximately
Early 19th century–early 20th century
Changed approximately
1880s–1930s

Lamarck made inheritance of acquired characteristics central to his evolutionary theory. Repeated use could strengthen an organ, disuse could weaken it, and those changes could then be passed to offspring. Similar ideas remained influential well beyond Lamarck; even Darwin considered mechanisms that might transmit effects acquired during life.

The important distinction that emerged later was between changes to the body and changes to the material passed to offspring. August Weismann argued that reproductive cells—the germ line—were separated from ordinary body cells. A stronger arm built through exercise changes the body, but it does not normally rewrite the inherited material in sperm or eggs.

Mendelian genetics, chromosome biology, and later population genetics then showed how evolution could proceed through inherited variants that are passed on, recombined, gained through mutation, and filtered by natural selection and chance.

Environmental conditions can still affect later generations in some cases. Maternal effects, developmental conditions, cultural inheritance, and some epigenetic changes can persist. Those effects are not the broad rule proposed by classical Lamarckian theories, in which bodily changes caused by use, injury, disuse, or need routinely become inherited evolutionary changes.

Evidence

Sources and what they establish

Previous belief

  • Zoological PhilosophyProject Gutenberg

    English translation of Lamarck's 1809 account emphasizing use, disuse, and inheritance of modifications.

Historical context

  • Experiments in Plant HybridisationElectronic Scholarly Publishing

    Mendel's experiments established particulate hereditary patterns that did not behave like routine blending or inheritance of acquired change.

Primary research

  • The Structure of DNANature

    The DNA double-helix model helped establish a physical mechanism for copying hereditary information.

Related entries

Or go somewhere else: