Not a fact anymore
Routine episiotomy prevents severe tearing, protects the pelvic floor, and improves childbirth outcomes.
What we know now
Routine episiotomy does not provide those broad benefits and can increase pain, blood loss, healing problems, and serious perineal injury. Restrictive use produces better outcomes for most spontaneous vaginal births.
Why it changed
Episiotomy became standard practice during the 20th century despite weak supporting evidence. Randomized trials and systematic reviews found that routine cutting did not prevent the injuries it was supposed to avoid.
- Status
- Overturned
- Category
- Medicine
- Accepted for
- ≈69 years
- Accepted approximately
- Early to late 20th century
- Changed approximately
- 1980s–2000s