Not a fact anymore

RNA cannot serve as hereditary material.

What we know now

Many viruses use RNA genomes, and RNA molecules can store, copy, and transmit hereditary information. Cellular organisms use DNA as their principal long-term genome, but heredity is not chemically restricted to DNA.

Why it changed

RNA was often treated mainly as an intermediary between DNA and protein. Experiments with tobacco mosaic virus separated viral RNA from protein and showed that the RNA determined infectivity and inherited strain characteristics.

Status
Overturned
Category
Genetics
Accepted for
≈12 years
Accepted approximately
1940s–1950s
Changed approximately
1956–1957

Once DNA was established as the hereditary material of cells, RNA was often assigned a secondary role: an intermediate that copied information from DNA and helped express it.

Tobacco mosaic virus provided a direct test of whether that hierarchy was universal. The virus consists largely of RNA wrapped in a protein coat, and researchers could separate the components experimentally.

Reconstituted virus containing the RNA became infectious again. More importantly, experiments using components from different viral strains showed that inherited viral characteristics followed the RNA, not the protein coat.

RNA could therefore function as a genome.

Many viruses are now known to use RNA as their hereditary material, while cellular organisms use DNA for long-term genome storage.

The result does not make RNA and DNA interchangeable in every setting. Their chemical stability, replication, and repair differ substantially.

It also differs from the broader claim that RNA is “only a messenger.” RNA can serve hereditary, catalytic, regulatory, and structural roles; this card is specifically about its ability to carry genetic information across generations of a replicating system.

Evidence

Sources and what they establish

Primary research

Historical context

Related entries

Or go somewhere else: